Where No Democratic Officeholder Has Gone Before

Meet Amanda Janoo, the first person to declare a Democratic candidacy for governor in 2026. She follows in the lineage of past challengers to Gov. Phil Scott in one very important — and unusual, if not unprecedented — way: No one who has been the Democratic gubernatorial nominee since Peter Shumlin’s last run in 2014, meaning no Phil Scott opponent ever, entered the race while holding elective office as a pure-D Democrat.

And that’s a massive, damning indictment of the Democratic establishment.

Let’s do the rundown.

  • 2016: Sue Minter, former state representative and member of Shumlin’s cabinet, the only Scott challenger who had ever held any elective office as a pure-D Democrat. She’d served three terms as a state representative from Waterbury, ending in 2011.
  • 2018: Christine Hallquist, CEO of the Vermont Electric Cooperative.
  • 2020: Lt. Gov. David Zuckerman, who served as a Progressive/Democrat and got little to no support from the Democratic Party or its donor base.
  • 2022; Brenda Siegel, nonprofit executive and advocate on housing and homelessness policy.
  • 2024: Esther Charlestin, co-chair of the Vermont Commission on Women. (She had served on the nonpartisan Middlebury select board.)

And now Amanda Janoo, who’s had a very impressive career completely outside the realm of partisan politics. She has stepped forward at a time when top-tier and second-tier and bottom-of-the-chili-pot Democrats are nowhere to be seen.

Again, a damning indictment of the party and its (cough) leaders.

Janoo is an economic policy expert who has advised nations around the world. She works at the Wellbeing Economy Alliance, which seeks to develop economic systems that prioritize the wellbeing of people and the planet over traditional, GDP-centered models of growth. Which might sound a bit foo-foo, but Her work has involved creating and implementing practical solutions. She’s got ideas for how to make Vermont a better place for its residents and creative approaches for how to get there. Which is more than you can say for the incumbent.

Janoo announced her candidacy in a two-minute YouTube video which is well worth your time. Her candidacy is well worth your consideration.

She may not be alone in the Democratic race. Aly Richards, former head of Let’s Grow Kids and current chair of the University of Vermont Medical Center board, is said to be pondering a bid. Given the circumstances, I think that would be a positive development. It would create interest in, and news coverage of, a primary race.

That’s crucial. The advantages of unpaid attention this spring and summer far outweigh concerns about wasting time and resources. Heck, I’d advise them to hit the road together — not just traditional candidate forums, but just getting out there, meeting people and presenting their visions for Vermont. It’s not something that traditional politicians would do, but then our traditional politicians have failed us repeatedly for a full decade now.

The odds are very long for the eventual Democratic nominee, unless Scott decides to bug out. And if he does, then I’d bet a shiny new nickel that one (or more) of our timorous Democratic officeholders would suddenly find their courage and elbow their way into the race.

That’s fun to speculate about but can’t be counted on. What we have now is a brave woman with good ideas who’s willing to give it a go. She deserves our thanks and full consideration.

4 thoughts on “Where No Democratic Officeholder Has Gone Before

  1. leftsuperbly0d2d8860ff's avatarleftsuperbly0d2d8860ff

    While I agree that Ms. Janoo sounds like an interesting candidate, I do not agree with your harsh judgment of current officeholders.

    As you have admitted elsewhere, running against Scott will be an uphill battle for anyone who undertakes it. Whether he should be or not (spoiler alert: he shouldn’t), he’s often noted as the most popular governor in the country. The odds of beating him if he runs are, alas, quite low.

    So aspirants need to decide whether it makes more sense to give up their current offices and then lose a gubernatorial race or remain where they are and live to fight another day, maintaining whatever electoral viability they possess. Anyone with real ambition is well advised to make the latter choice. In short, there’s a reason why, after Sue Minter, only sacrificial lambs offered themselves up to run against Scott.

    And that’s not to mention — as a friend quite correctly pointed out — that running for statewide office (at least doing so seriously) is a major commitment of time, resources, energy and emotional well-being.

    Defend your snark, if you wish to, but please take into consideration these and other points of which I’m sure you’re far more aware than I.

    Reply
    1. John S. Walters's avatarJohn S. Walters Post author

      I don’t blame any individual because running a statewide campaign is a frightfully heavy lift even if you’re not going up against the most popular pol in the state. But the collective failure is just shocking.

      Reply
  2. v ialeggio's avatarv ialeggio

    plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose

    Phil Hoff once that he pretty much became the 1962 Democratic gubernatorial nominee by default. “I’d like to claim it was a tough fight for the nomination but in truth in the Democratic ranks quite often it wasn’t a case of which of the many candidates will we run – but whose turn is it to lose?”

    Reply

Leave a reply to leftsuperbly0d2d8860ff Cancel reply