Peter Galbraith has a new WikiFriend

A few days ago, VTDigger’s Jasper Craven reported that an anonymous someone had been doing a whole lot of editing to Peter Galbraith’s Wikipedia page. The person known as “Devotedamerican” made dozens of edits to Galbraith’s entry between 2008 and 2011, all adding material favorable to Galbraith or removing unfavorable information. During that period, Galbraith actively considered a run for governor before deciding to run for state senate in 2010.

Devotedamerican has been silent since 2011. But now, Galbraith has a new WikiFriend, “Westerncivil.” It’s a cognomen strikingly similar in content and structure to “Devotedamerican.”

Westerncivil began editing Galbraith’s entry in the fall of 2014, but was only occasionally active until June 10, when Westerncivil made eleven separate edits to Galbraith’s page in a single day.

Craven’s article revealing Devotedamerican was posted on June 9.

Coincidence? Ehh, not buying it.

And Westerncivil has never edited anything else on Wikipedia.

Also, just as Devotedamerican was criticized by fellow WikiEditors for excessive deletions, Westerncivil has been upbraided by a core Wikipedia editor named McMatter:

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Peter W. Galbraith, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please refrain from removing sourced information and using misleading edit summaries to avoid detection.

I’m sure that, if asked, Galbraith will deny that he is Westerncivil, just as he denied being Devotedamerican. But if it’s not Galbraith, it’s someone who pays very close attention to Vermont news and is obsessively protective of Galbraith’s reputation.

And if we know anything about Peter Galbraith, it’s that he is a very prideful (some would say narcissistic) man who reacts harshly to criticism from any source.

Which is why I see this as a story worth pursuing. It’s a measure of a man who wants to be governor but may well be temperamentally unsuited for the job. Given his record, he’ll have to prove he can Work Well With Others to earn my vote.

And now, a bit more evidence that Devotedamerican is actually Peter Galbraith. Here is one of Devotedamerican’s Wikipedia additions, dated June 18, 2008.

“In 1995, he was the co-mediator and principal architect of the Erdut Agreemnt that ended the war in Croatia by providing for the peaceful reintegration of Serb-held Eastern Slavonia.”

And here is an almost identical passage from the bio section of Galbraith’s gubernatorial campaign website.

“He was principal architect of the 1995 Erdut Agreement that ended the war in Croatia by providing for peaceful reintegration of Serb-held Eastern Slavonia into Croatia.”

And here’s another example. First, Devotedamerican, March 5, 2008.

“In 1987, he uncovered Saddam Hussein’s systematic destruction of Kurdish villages and a year later wrote “The Prevention of Genocide Act of 1988” which would have imposed comprehensive sanctions on Iraq because of the gassing of the Kurds.”

And again, from his current campaign website:

“In 1987, Peter uncovered Saddam Hussein’s systematic destruction of Kurdish villages. A year later Peter wrote (and got the US Senate to pass) the “Prevention of Genocide Act of 1988” to impose comprehensive sanctions on Iraq because of the gassing of the Kurds.”

There are only two explanations for this remarkable congruence, and neither of them is “coincidence.” Either the man behind Devotedamerican also wrote Galbraith’s campaign bio, or his campaign is cribbing his official biography off Wikipedia. Which would be a stunningly lazy and perilous thing to do.

Yeah, Peter Galbraith is Devotedamerican. All signs point to him as the brains behind Westerncivil as well.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Peter Galbraith has a new WikiFriend

  1. Brooke Paige

    Peter is the true genius of his own little world of one, looks like his pretend “best friend” has been working overtime shining up Peter’s reputation for him. Wouldn’t want any of that dirty oil deal cash showing up at an inopportune moment. For some reason none of this is surprising !

    Reply
  2. NanuqFC

    At Sunday’s gubernatorial candidate forum in St. Albans, Galbraith strongly supported the state’s dumping fossil fuels. I wondered how he reconciles that stance with his wealth from Kurdish oil.

    And btw, Gailbraith’s wikipedia page pops up first in a Google search for “Kurdish oil Peter Galbraith,” and it’s not marked as a paid placement.

    Reply
  3. newzjunqie

    The wiki struck me as being evenhanded & fair — positive far outweighs the negative. Looks like he feels the need to eliminate any & all perception of wrongdoings. The doggedness & lengths undertaken is what I find disturbing.

    Plus rather futile as all editing activity can be, looks like it is, being monitored judging from how many times he foolishly keeps getting caught attempting the many “revisions”.

    Great story, appreciate the follow-through by Jasper Craven & others as it serves as warning of what we could expect & why ppl like Galbraith despite perhaps some good ideas, and bad also imo, cannot be trusted near the levers of power, and will become a neverending headache just as Shummys’ antics have been & continues to be with countdown of *six more months* to go.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_W._Galbraith

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s