The South Burlington Whitewash

There once was a town called Nigella. It was a nondescript little Podunk, located near a larger and more notable community. Its residents were almost entirely white. Its high school sports teams were named, in a more benighted era, the Niggers. Many of the kids would attend games in blackface, and the mascot was a Stepin Fetchit character who danced and hooted when the team scored a touchdown. All innocent fun, and no one in this lily-white town conceived otherwise.

Then came the civil rights era, and the school had a problem on its hands. The nickname was a piece of the town’s history, and nobody wanted to change it. So they dropped the mascot and banned the blackface, claiming the nickname was never intended as a racial slur — merely a light-hearted callback to the town’s real name.

You know where I’m going with this. Last night, the South Burlington School Board voted to keep the “Rebel” nickname, claiming that it had a specific meaning in their community and had nothing whatsoever to do with the Confederacy or slavery.

“It’s what we make of it. It’s something artificial,” said [an SBHS alum]. “I don’t think the intention is to offend anyone or promote racism.”

Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. Words acquire connotations. “Rebel” has other meanings, but its primary connotation is with the wrong side in the Civil War. You know, the one that wanted to keep on owning slaves, and was willing to kill the United States of America in order to do so.

Maybe, just maybe, longtime South Burlingtonians can convince themselves that they’ve established a new, specific heritage for “Rebel.” But how does it look to the outside world? How does it look to new residents of different races?

Why did one non-white student leave the room “in tears” after the vote, saying she wanted to vomit? Why did Mary Brown Guillory, a longtime South Burlington resident and head of an NAACP chapter, react with these words?

“Don’t fool yourselves when you think you are brushing it under the rug,” she said. “How dare you want your kids to define that name and carry it on so that it can live. It’s nothing but hate, that’s all it is.”

And you can’t change that with a well-meaning whitewash of the nickname.

“There’s been a lot of conversation about whether the rebel name should be re-branded,” [School Board President Elizabeth] Fitzgerald said. “I believe the decision was made over 20 years ago to eliminate the offensive connection with the Confederate south.”

I’m sorry, but you did not “eliminate the offensive connection.” The word has acquired a deep and troubled meaning, and you can’t “eliminate” that with a few symbolic actions.

Nor can you do so with a proposed “steering committee” tasked with further whitewashing efforts.

There was a curious sentence in Free Press reporter Haley Dover’s story — a sentence that, I’m sorry to say, could only be written by a white person in a predominantly white community.

Many people were unaware of the historical significance of the nickname because there have been no direct references to the Confederacy since the 1970s.

And by “many people” she means “white people.” I doubt there are many black folks who are “unaware.”

If this story gets picked up by the national media, South Burlington is going to look like an ignorant little hick town that’s no better than Daniel Snyder, the unrepentant owner of Washington, D.C.’s pro football team. He insists that “Redskins” is a badge of honor, and he’s done quite a bit of whitewashing to try to convince everyone that he can change the connotation of a racist word.

He’s wrong. And so is the South Burlington School Board.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “The South Burlington Whitewash

  1. Eddie Garcia

    Dantooine is to remote to make an effective demonstration, but don’t worry. We will deal with your rebel friends there soon enough.
    Do you also propose to ban songs by the Crystals and David Bowie?

    Reply
      1. Neil Gerdes

        I must vehemently disagree. Rebellious teenagers. Rebelling against the system. This is perfectly fine usage. This is PC overreach.

  2. odum

    When I first heard this, I’ll admit to being annoyed. I don’t think the Confederate context has overwhelmed the basic meaning of this rather mundane word that one can generally hear put to its intended use any given day on the news.

    But then a more thorough news report laid out the history of the term. And it is, in fact, rooted in that context.

    So to hell with it. And I don’t want to hear about heritage or tradition, especially this far north of the mason dixon. As a native southerner, that’s my heritage and my tradition. And I say drop the name. “Say” is probably too weak a word… “demand” is more like it.

    And “drop” is probably a bit weak too. How about burn the name and salt the Earth.

    Reply
  3. walter moses

    Ah gee, John, you need something to do. You gotta get out more. Visit a wind “farm”, go solar, go shopping.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s