Cloudy and very windy with a good chance of mayhem

The Senate Rules Committee did its level best to banish Norm McAllister to legislative limbo, but the Predator Senator shows little indication he’s willing to play along. After the Committee voted 3-2 to suspend him until his criminal case is over, McAllister said “I do not intend to go quietly,” and threatened a court battle over the move, either by himself or by constituents who support him. So what happens if the Senate votes to remove him on January 5, and McAllister or his allies convince a judge to stay the suspension while the lawsuit wends its way through the courts?

Well, then, he toddles right back to his desk on the Senate floor and sits there like a turd in the punchbowl. And your tax dollars will be at work, defending the Senate against the suit.

And it might lose. Legal opinions are split on the legality of suspension.

Senate Secretary John Bloomer said that suspension could be done simply and cleanly, while expulsion would require long and messy hearings. However, as Paul Heintz reported:

Luke Martland, the legislature’s chief counsel, disagreed. He argued that the effect of suspension would be similar to that of expulsion and would therefore require some sort of due process.

Oh boy.

If this is turning into a slow-motion nightmare for the Senate, it may be an even bigger headache for Vermont Republicans, especially in Franklin County. If McAllister is so intent on keeping his seat, even in the face of overwhelming discomfort among his colleagues, then it’s hard to imagine he won’t run for re-election. Given the power of incumbency, he’d be very likely to win a Republican primary and appear on the November ballot. WHich could lead to the Republicans losing a seat they thought they had in the bag.

And then there’s this.

Even if the suspension sticks, and McAllister is found guilty of his charges, he could still return to the Senate. Bloomer said the state Constitution asserts that if voters re-elect McAllister with the knowledge of his conviction, he cannot be expelled.

“If he’s found guilty of something and he is re-elected in November, you can’t expel him,” Bloomer said.

Yep, that’s right. We may never be rid of this guy.

4 thoughts on “Cloudy and very windy with a good chance of mayhem

  1. newzjunqie

    Can’t they change the rules, barring scumbags and sexual predators from legislative service? Law enforcement , corrections etc (I think) are prohibited from this type of conduct. It would mean that under the Scumbag Law, perhaps considering renters etc and these living circumstances classified as ‘vulnerable adults’, similar to pressuring employees for sex aka sexual harrassment, which appears they were.

    1. John S. Walters Post author

      At the very least, there ought to be a recall provision in state law. Right now, Franklin County voters have only two options: be represented by an admitted sex criminal, or lose representation. They should have a third option.

  2. newzjunqie

    Would be a bit less awful if he had just kept mouth shut (but not much). Has the audacity to blame others (boo hoo what did I do to deserve this?!), cry about being financially ruined, while admittedly victimizing troubled youth and exploiting vulnerable adults who have nothing but lots of elbow grease. Now he’s being “bullied” by fellow legislators waaah.

    Could and can always act like a man, step down make statement of not wishing to be distract fellow legislators or somesuch while maintaining innocent-til-proven stance as this could also hurt election prospects for the right but looks like a few of them maybe shouldn’t be returned.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s