How to reverse course without changing position

… The Phil Scott Way.

Congratulations to our Lieutenant Governor for arriving at the right answer on Syrian refugees. It only took him eight days to do it, which is kind of unseemly for a guy who wants to be our take-charge, New-Direction chief executive. A bit more clarity and alacrity would seem to be minimal qualifications for the corner office. But congratulations anyway: he may have taken the scenic route (unusual for a veteran race car driver), but he did manage to arrive at the right destination.

Scott now says it’s okay for Vermont to accept Syrian refugees. Also, he dubiously claims that his position hasn’t changed.

Which, hahaha. Let’s look at the record.

On November 17, Scott said the following to VPR’s Steve Zind:

“I think it’s incumbent upon us to [bar Syrian refugees] until such time as the federal government can prove it’s meeting its national security obligations,” said Scott.

Need I point out that “can prove” is an awfully high bar? Can the government absolutely prove it’s meeting its obligations? Especially without, say, revealing information best kept on the down-low?

But after Zind’s story appeared, Scott basically accused Zind of misquoting him. He said his real position was pro-refugee — but with some pretty stringent conditions.

I want to be clear that my goal is to ensure the federal program moves forward with security protocols Vermonters, and all Americans, can have confidence in.

And as I previously pointed out, it’ll be a cold day in Hell before “all Americans” are confident about anything the government does.

Turns out he didn’t really mean that. What he meant was, there ought to be a pause in the refugee program until one specific American was convinced. That one American? Phil Scott, natch.

…as WPTZ’s Stewart Ledbetter first reported Tuesday, Scott had a change of heart after taking part in a U.S. Department of State conference call last Friday and meeting with Vermont Department of Public Safety officials Tuesday in Waterbury.

… “I learned a lot from [DPS officials] about where some of the security risks really are,” he said, pointing to student visas and the Canadian border as areas of concern. “I came away being much more comfortable than I was and having a better understanding of what that process is.”

Personally, I’m glad that Phil has had his come-to-Jesus moment. Glad to know he’ll be siding with the Democrats and supporting Governor Shumlin’s plan to accept Syrian refugees. Glad to know he’s at odds with every single Republican candidate for President and every single Republican member of Congress. But here’s a curious passage from his midstream position paper:

Simply dismissing concerns by saying the program is “rigorous” without explaining precisely how it is structured and how it works to ensure security only adds to concerns and adds fuel to the political fire.

But wait, Phil. Aren’t you now telling us “the program is ‘rigorous’ without explaining precisely how it is structured and how it works”?

Aren’t you asking us to take Phil Scott’s word for it, even though you insisted we shouldn’t take Peter Shumlin’s word for it?

Why? Because you’re Phil Scott, the paragon of probity, beloved by all Vermonters?

Our Lieutenant Governor may have arrived at the right conclusion. But it took him a good while. And his insistence that his position is unchanged rings hollow. It sure looks like a waffle.

And he’s generously given his opponents, both Democratic and Republican, a fair bit of ammunition for the coming campaign.

In the language of racing that he loves so much, Phil Scott is runnin’ a little loose in the turns. He might want to head for Pit Road to tighten up his ride.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “How to reverse course without changing position

  1. Faith Biggs King

    Classic sleight-of-hand, Orwellian-crap from Mr. Scott. So, if I take his point, now people are “add[ing] fuel to the political fire” when they note we already have a pretty “rigorous” immigration process? In other words, speaking the truth is the ‘problem’? (I heard the clearance process lasts. oh, 1,000 days). But wait, the people in charge of a rigorous immigration process – which any dim-wit could’ve inquired about if said dim-wit wanted to – are now the ones at fault for not providing a better explanation. Right. I.e. ‘I got scared of the Syrians and it’s all your fault for not making me feel better sooner’. Either Scott: (a) genuinely means this – in which case he should be immediately disqualified on the basis of mental incapacity (b) he suffers from a charming inability to take responsibility for what he’s done or said or (c) he’s a manipulative SOB. ‘Hey, don’t look at the fact that the Republican party has gone all bat-shit Fascist – look over there! This disgraceful, bigoted eruption is all their fault for not explaining the immigration process better.’ Good try. The show needs a little tuning up, Phil, before it’s ready for the big time.

    Reply
  2. Dave G.

    Mr. Scott’s actions are very disingenuous, but I expect the awe of the Ricky Bobby racing suit will prohibit some Vermonters from ever seeing him for the charlatan he is.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s