Full marks to Governor Shumlin for refusing to succumb to the hysteria gripping so many of his fellows, and keeping the light on for Syrian refugees in Vermont.
“The refugees from Syria are no different than the refugees from anywhere else in the world,” Shumlin told reporters. “I would encourage us to do what Vermont has always done … It’s the spirit of all Vermonters to ensure that when you have folks who are drowning, who are dying in pursuit of freedom, that Vermont does its part.”
At last count, 16 governors had said they would refuse to accept refugees from Syria. Including, shamefully, New Hampshire Democrat Maggie Hassan.
So I forced myself to watch the Republican presidential debate last week. Overall impressions?
Ben Carson excepted, these guys are articulate spokespeople for a worldview completely at odds with reality. Also, whoever gets the nomination is going to be an albatross around Phil Scott’s neck.
I mentioned this in my previous post, but the point deserves further attention.
In a relatively serious, issue-oriented debate, the Republicans presented an array of positions that made George W. Bush look like a liberal. And we all know how popular George W. was in Vermont — the only state he never visited as President. (Dick Cheney made one stop, a quick in-and-out at the Burlington Airport.)
To put it another way, the Republican presidential nominee will not help Phil Scott or his party-broadening project. Not the least tiny little bit.
Submitted for your consideration, two politicians. One is widely seen as a failure; the other, a stunning success.
Now, two numbers: 110,970 and 87,075.
Finally, we raise the curtain.
The first politico is Randy Brock. He won 110,970 votes in his “disastrous” 2012 run for governor.
The second is Scott Milne. He garnered 87,075 votes in his 2014 near-victory.
Randy Brock the “failure” outpolled Scott Milne the “success” by nearly 24,000 votes.