Author Archives: John S. Walters

Unknown's avatar

About John S. Walters

Writer, editor, sometime radio personality, author of "Roads Less Traveled: Visionary New England Lives."

News You Should View: Echoes of Trump

At the beginning of every week, I wonder if I’m going to find enough content to fill out this feature. So far, I get more than I can really include. Even in our sadly diminished media ecosystem, there’s still a lot of material worth checking out. And here we go…

“An enormously dangerous moment.” The latest edition of Mark Johnson’s “802 News” podcast is a short but brutally impactful interview with journalist and author Garrett Graff about the Trump administration so far. Graff outlines twin crises unfolding before our eyes: “A quick unraveling of many of the foundations of our smooth and functioning democracy and our smooth and functioning federal government.” Trump is undermining both, and either could lead us “toward a future catastrophe.” It’s well worth the 15 minutes. (Available on your podcast player of choice or via the WCAX-TV website.)

A Trump triple threat. The latest Montpelier Bridge contains not one, not two, but three articles describing the potentially devastating impacts of the Trump regime on the state and local levels. Matthew Thomas writes that Vermont is likely to see a two-thirds cut in flood relief funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fiona Sullivan reports on federal cuts in child care and food aid for schools, and Phil Dodd has what should be a positive story about a plan to convert the Washington County Mental Health Services building in Montpelier into affordable apartments — but the whole plan depends on securing federal grant funds. Extra bonus: WCMHS is also worried about potential federal cuts. This all underscores Garrett Graff’s second big point: “Americans really don’t understand the myriad ways the federal government underpins the safety, security and stability of our daily lives.” Trump fucks around, we find out.

Continue reading

Pieciak is Everywhere

It’s pretty obvious to any Vermont Political Observer, capitalized or otherwise, that the skids are being heavily greased for Treasurer Mike Pieciak to be the next Democratic nominee for governor. But I’d like to point out a small but telling piece of evidence that should not go unremarked upon.

Last week the Vermont Bar Association held a meeting in Manchester, and the occasion was marked by near-universal castigation of the Trump administration’s assault on the legal system (as reported, after the fact, by VTDigger). Members unanimously approved a statement affirming their support for the rule of law. In addition, Digger reports, more than 200 Vermont attorneys and elected officials have signed a statement “supporting the independence of the judiciary and outlining 15 instances of the current administration allegedly disregarding the rule of law.” The statement also announces a rally for lawyers opposed to Trump’s trample on May 3 in Burlington.

Prominent people quoted in the article include Reiber, Attorney General Charity Clark, Bar Association board president (and former deputy AG) Josh Diamond, former assistant U.S. Attorney Scott McGee, Bennington attorney David Silver, and his daughter, attorney* Natalie Silver…

… and Treasurer Mike Pieciak.

Okay, Pieciak is, in fact, a member of the Bar, so technically he qualifies. But he hasn’t been an active attorney since February 2014, when he took a position in the Peter Shumlin administration. He’s been in state government, not as an attorney, ever since.

*Correction: Silver is not an attorney. She is a law school graduate awaiting her law license.

Continue reading

“A Disturbing Trend of Actions,” You Say

Fortunately for the delicate balance of democratic government in Vermont, Gov. Phil Scott’s idea of executive overreach isn’t nearly as bad as Donald Trump’s. But that’s kind of like saying the flu is preferable to cancer. You’d rather not get either one, really.

But the governor’s unilateral imposition of new rules for the General Assistance Emergency Housing program prompted a sharp rebuke from the Legislature’s top lawyer. As reported by VTDigger/Vermont Public reporter Carly Berlin, Legislative Counsel director Brynn Hare has deemed Scott’s action “an unconstitutional encroachment on a core function of the Legislature.” Further, she said, his action is “the latest in a disturbing trend of actions by the Administration that flagrantly and unconstitutionally intrude on the authority of the General Assembly.” That trend also includes his appointment of Zoie Saunders as interim Education Secretary after the Senate had rejected her nomination, and his unilateral action authorizing the sale of “Vermont Strong” license plates after the flood of July 2023.

Which is ironic, don’t you think, considering that Scott has been obsessively jealous of the separation of powers when it’s in his interest. He has vetoed a whole bunch of bills on the sole basis that they allegedly intruded on the power of the executive. Well, shoe’s on the other foot now, governor.

Continue reading

Big Boy, Big Little Toys (UPDATED With Astonishingly Well-Timed April Fools Day Prank)

The Monday VTDigger feed brings us some not terribly surprising news: That Gov. Phil Scott is apparently enamored of an emerging technology as a way to produce more renewable energy in-state.

Well, some would put quotes around “renewable,” because his gizmo of choice is a new generation of small modular nuclear reactors. See, large-scale wind and solar are just too much for our poor Vermont environment to take, but hey, let’s spread a bunch of mini-nukes around the landscape. What could go wrong?

It was a fine piece of reporting by Digger, written by intern Olivia Gieger*, inspired by a March 21 social media post by the governor (that otherwise seems to have gone unnoticed) touting small reactors as a possible solution to our green-energy problems.

*Insert obligatory “counter” joke here. I’m sure she’s never heard it before.

Continue reading

Congratulations to Senate Republicans for Making Phil Scott’s Fondest Wish Come True

Hooray, Phil Scott is going to get what he wants. Again.

Every time there’s an inflection point in the General Assistance Emergency Housing program (d/b/a the motel voucher program), it’s always the same thing. Scott takes a hard line against spending a dime more on vouchers… we get close to a mass unsheltering… and then he does a last-minute walk-back, offering a compromise to keep at least some people in the program.

But he simply cannot include everyone. Some folks just HAVE to be unsheltered. It’s like his one and only bedrock principle when it comes to vouchers. Some folks have gotta lose.

And here we are again. Scott rejected the Legislature’s move to extend winter eligibility rules through June, and later — as he always does — he offered a partial extension, which belies his supposedly principled argument against spending any more money on vouchers.

This is nothing new. So for the rest of this post, my attention turns to the Republican Senate caucus’ role in backstopping the governor, and the deeply misleading press release put out after the vote by caucus leader Sen. Scott Beck.

Continue reading

News You Should View: There’s Some Good Stuff Out There

Not much of a subtitle, sorry. More of a restatement of this weekly feature’s origin: Our media landscape may be vastly reduced from its former glory days, but there’s still some good stuff being produced that’s worth your time. This week’s haul…

Quite Literally Ripped from the Headlines. You won’t often find a summer theater company cited in this space, but one of the Weston Playhouse’s 2025 offerings is “A Distinct Society,” a new play set in the Haskell Free Library that centers around its unique straddle-the-border location. From the description: “When an Iranian father and his daughter, separated by the international border, start using the library as a meeting place, the denizens of this quiet sanctuary find their lives suddenly full of excitement and consequence.” Presumably the play was written before the recent crackdown at Haskell, but it seems all the more relevant right now. Excitement and consequence indeed. Performances from August 20-31.

Burlington Dems Get Fast and Loose with the Chats. For the second week in a row, Seven Days enters the honor roll for the kind of story that made its reputation: A public records request that uncovered extensive texts among Democratic members of City Council during 2024 meetings, including a lot of chatty, gossipy stuff and more than a few close brushes with open meetings law. The Dems, who have a working majority on Council, would often discuss tactics amongst themselves while taking part in a public meeting. Council President Ben Traverse says texting is “simply part of modern government,” but he also told his fellow Dems to cool their jets after Seven Days filed its public records request. Technically they’re not violating the law because there were only six Democrats on the 12-member Council but Independent Mark Barlow is a Dem in all but name, so if the letter of the law hasn’t been violated, the spirit of the law has gotten a damn good rogering.

Embezzlement in Hardwick? Really now. The Hardwick Gazette reports that a local woman embezzled thousands of dollars from three local nonprofit organizations. The victims included the East Hardwick Fire District (which has been reimbursed by the alleged thief), NEK Arts, and the Hardwick Downtown Partnership. The total involved was less than $20,000 all told, but you might expect that organizations in and around Hardwick would be a bit more careful after the infamous $1.6 million embezzlement case involving the Hardwick Electric Department. It’s been a while, but still. (Discloure: I serve on the board of Northeast Kingdom Public Journalism, which operates the Gazette. But I would have listed this story in any case.)

Continue reading

Let’s Take a Moment to Marvel at the Dispassionate Reasoning of Vermont Conservatives

Thankfully, the tide appears to be ebbing on the Great Statehouse Trans PANIC! of 2025. It’s been days since the Vermont Daily Chronicle could gin up any fresh angles on the ridiculous story. Which, as a reminder, featured a group of Christian conservatives whining — inaccurately — that their free speech rights had been trampled by a handful of trans folk dancing around a Statehouse meeting room. As we previously noted, there is no First Amendment right to deliver speech in a given location or on a given medium.

But before we consign this fiasco to the dustbin of history, we should take note of two particularly ridiculous attempts to exploit this mildest of contretemps. First, a tiny extremist “parental rights” group unwittingly exposing the absurdity of its own claims. And second, the head of the Vermont Republican Party claiming that state lawmakers have a solemn duty to maintain a perfect attendance record.

This will involve a bit of exposure to the rantings of SPEAKVT, a group of far-right rabble-rousers in the Essex-Westford school district. The group’s president Marie Tiemann put out a statement about the March 12 “detransitioning” event sponsored by SPEAKVT and the Vermont Family Alliance. Funny thing, her statement is kind of a self-own.

Continue reading

I Don’t Know if Heads Will Roll in Rutland, but Heads Will Definitely Be Shaking

The above image is not the seal of the city of Rutland. Well, most of it is. But the Latin motto at the bottom is a mischievous addition. “Quidam amici optimi mei sunt Musulmanus” translates, more or less, to “Some of My Best Friends Are Muslim.” The actual city seal does not feature a Latin motto at all; instead, across the bottom it says “A Town Sept. 7, 1761, A City Nov. 19, 1892.”

We’ll get to the history in a moment. But first, breaking news. This fake seal somehow ended up on the front cover of the city government’s annual report for the fiscal year that ended last June. You can’t see it terribly well, but here’s a picture:

You may or may not be able to make out the words, but it’s clearly the Muslim-friendly Latin, not that boring Town/City stuff.

Oopsie.

Continue reading

The Scott Administration Hits a New Low

Gov. Phil Scott has dug in his heels on the General Assistance emergency housing program, and it’s not a pretty sight. He used his Wednesday news conference to decry the Legislature’s failure to “come to the table,” but the real meaning of that phrase, in his mind, is that they failed to do precisely what he wanted them to do.

I’m sorry, but that’s not coming to the table. That’s jumping up and down on the table and holding your breath until you turn blue.

Look. First, the Legislature adopted a Budget Adjustment Act that included at least 90% of the governor’s proposal plus a few additional items that were almost entirely offset by savings in the Treasurer’s budget. Scott vetoed the bill. The Legislature then passed a new BAA that stripped away almost all their adds on one condition, and only one: That Scott agree to extend winter eligibility rules for the voucher program from April 1 to June 30. By the Legislature’s revised reckoning, the Department of Children and Families already has enough money to make that happen.

And now Scott is stamping his feet and bellowing “No, no, no!”

Continue reading

PANIC! At the Statehouse

You know the funny thing about all those conservatives who carry pocket Constitutions everywhere they go, many of whom revere our founding document as divinely inspired?

The funny thing is, they have no idea what the First Amendment says or means. Are those pocket Constitutions ever actually read, or are they just fetish objects?

Latest example: The ongoing kerfuffle over a March 12 incident at the Statehouse, in which an event sponsored by the far-right Vermont Family Alliance was interrupted by a handful of dancing transgender folk. (To judge by available footage, it was the mildest, most unthreatening “disruption” I have ever seen in my life.) Eventually the meeting was shut down by the Sergeant at Arms. Conservatives instantly went into full tizzy mode over the trans folk’s alleged interference with VFA’s First Amendment rights.

I haven’t addressed this before because I thought it would go away (as it should), but the right-wing echo machine has cranked itself up to eleven. So I guess I have to explain this. Slowly.

The First Amendment guarantees your right of free speech. It does not guarantee your right to a particular platform. There is no Constitutional right to hold an event in Room 11 of the Statehouse, just as there is no Constitutional right to express your views in the pages of the New York Times or on a given social media platform or on a specific streetcorner or in a crowded theater.

The VFA folks could have gone out in the hall or out on the front lawn. Or anywhere. They didn’t have to be deterred by a few counter-protesters dancing around. Which, from available video evidence, is absolutely all they did.

Continue reading