Governor-elect Phil Scott’s first round of appointments came on Thanksgiving Eve. And honestly, the announcement was a touch underwhelming.
Nothing against the four appointees. But c’mon, three members of his transition team and the sole staffer in the Lieutenant Governor’s office? Did it really take three weeks to pluck the lowest-hanging fruit?
Would it be churlish of me to point out that in November 2010, Peter Shumlin had his inner circle in place less than ten days after the election, and had begun to fill out his cabinet by this point? Perhaps, but compared to the last Governor-elect, Phil Scott’s off to a slow start.
(Irony Alert: When Shumlin took office, he made it clear that the single focus of his administration wouild be job creation. It’s deja vu all over again, just like last time.)
Also, it’d be reassuring to see at least one appointee who’s not a member of The Usual Suspects.
No sign of ideological diversity. No sign of much beyond loyalty to the incoming Governor. Except that two of the four come from the ranks of Statehouse business lobbyists*, so there’s that.
*Kendal Smith, lobbyist for the Vermont Chamber of Commerce. Jason Gibbs, whose communications firm did most of its business repping big corporations. What viewpoint, a liberal might wonder, will a former lobbyist for Big Pharma bring to the next round of health care reform deliberations?
In fairness, the inner circle isn’t usually a place for diverse views; it’s for people willing to be a subservient member of the governor’s team and do their best to carry out his agenda, instead of advancing their own.
On the other other hand, it’s not exactly heartening to hear Jason Gibbs talk about the managerial successes of the Douglas administration (creator of the disastrous Challenges for Change initiative); or see on Kendal Smith’s resume that she fundraised for, and worked in the administration of, the disastrous Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal; or recall Brittney Wilson’s inept efforts to depict Phil Scott as thoroughly pro-choice while also loudly dog-whistling the anti-abortion community*. Those are small bur worrying signs. And subsuming their personal beliefs aside, these people will have the Governor’s ear on a daily basis. That’s a powerful thing.
*Wilson on Vermont Right To Life, 10/31/16:
“You have an organization that supports — that’s pro-life. That is not dangerous or harmful, in some respect, to other people. I think it’s — I don’t see this being a group that he would say, ‘Absolutely not, stay away.’”
The other new appointee, Rachel Feldman, is the least political of the four hires. And she’s in the least political of the four jobs: she’ll do some legislative outreach, although Kendal Smith will take the lead on that front. Feldman will also handle “constituent services and planning of trade missions and other events.”
It’s still far too early to make any definitive judgments.Plenty of time, and plenty of room left for the kind of out-of-the-box thinking that the Governor-elect promised. Still, like I said, a bit late and a little underwhelming.
Anyone else hearing that Scott will appoint Calais Selectman (and Progressive) John Brabant as Commissioner of the Department of Conservation? Apparently he was one of the handful of Progressives that went against their party line and endorsed Scott (over the wind issue?).
Brabant is affiliated with Annette Smith’s group, Vermonters for a Clean Environment. I haven’t heard any rumors, but your fundamental premise is correct.
I’m tired of these faux progressive/environmentalists coopting our party to further their pet political goals.
Honestly, if I never heard from Annette and her rabid bunch of anti-environmental followers in sheeps’ clothing again it would be too soon. Their goal is to increase the coal, fracked gas, hydo-quebec, and other environmentally-damaging energy producers output while limiting ANY renewable sources, yet they pretend like they’re concerned for the environment. It’s sickening how much of an outsized voice these people have in the dialogue.
Are Vermont Values, whatever the hell they are going to play any role in the selection process, like people saying they believe in Vermont Values, they endorse Vermont values, the practice Vermont Values?