I was skimming around in campaign finance reports the other day*, when I came across something that made me say “Hmm.” And here it is:
This is taken from the latest campaign finance filing of Common Sense Leadership PAC, House Minority Leader Don Turner’s slush fund political action committee. It indicates that one Bruce Lisman made a donation of $4,000 to CSLPAC on October 11.
Bruce Lisman. Of 716 Kipling Street, Houston, Texas.
Oh please, say it ain’t so, Bruce. Say you haven’t left us for a warm-weather tax haven. Especially after a campaign full of bumpf about what a true-blue Son of Vermont you were.
Reinforcing my curiosity were the fact that Lisman’s Twitter feed has been inactive since August 10, his campaign’s Facebook page was last updated on August 15, and his campaign website has been consigned to the same Internet purgatory populated by the remnants of AngelFire and GeoCities.
(Kids, ask your parents.)
Fortunately, I’ve been reassured by Lisman’s costly campaign manager, Shawn Shouldice:
Looks like someone’s gotten the ziggy at Free Press Media. Opening sentence of a story on the Free Press website:
Former Free Press Media President Jim Fogler is returning to his previous role, replacing Al Getler in the top job at the Burlington media company and newspaper.
The bulk of the article recaps Fogler’s career and describes what a great fit he is for the job. Getler, meanwhile? We do not speak of him. The only other reference to the apparently former president and publisher is this:
Getler was hired as president of Free Press Media in January 2015.
Oh well. Easy come, easy go. At least Al will have his ventriloquist sideline to fall back on.
No, really. Here’s a screenshot from his sizzle reel.
That’s the stuff. Sad to say, you can see his mouth move when his puppets “speak.”
Must have been some soiled britches at VTGOP headquarters when the news came out: a new poll shows the race for governor is a statistical dead heat.
If it’s accurate, of course. Usual caveats apply. Doesn’t help that this is the only pre-election poll we’re going to get, since VPR is the only media organization putting up money for surveys this year.
But for the sake of argument, let’s assume it’s reasonably on target.
There were reasons to believe the race would be close, but the almost universal assumption (me included) was that Phil Scott was the front-runner because of his name recognition, his inoffensive image, and Vermonters’ presumed post-Shumlin fatigue with liberal policymaking. Minter, by comparison, was known (to the extent she was known at all) mainly as a Shumlin underling, which meant she would struggle to create a profile of her own.
Instead, here we are, with Scott at 39 percent, Minter at 38, and a rather surprising 14 percent undecided.
So why is this race so close? Assuming, again, that the poll is accurate.