Well, that didn’t take long

In recent weeks, I’ve tried my damnedest not to comment on the Democratic presidential race. After shooting my keyboard off a few times earlier on, I began to realize that I was overreacting to the latest development instead of focusing on the bigger picture.

Political coverage encourages this kind of short-term thinking. The media have an interest in hyping up the news, to keep you tuned in or reading or clicking or However You Are Accessing Our Content. But in the long run, most of this stuff washes out.

If you needed any proof, just look at a roughly 48-hour period in the middle of this week. On Tuesday, there was a good chance of continuing deep division sparking a battle-marred convention that could have paved the way for a Trump presidency.

And then, not necessarily in this order, we got:

— Clinton scoring decisive victories on primary night

— Clinton capping the night with a strong victory speech

— Key Democrats making skillful overtures to Bernie Sanders

— Sanders deftly changing his tone: vowing to continue the battle on issues, but forswearing any attacks on Clinton

— Elizabeth Warren issuing a strong endorsement of Clinton

— President Obama doing the same.

And just like that, all the drama and intrigue and potential disaster of the last twelve months was just gone in a puff of smoke. Turned out that all the key players are grownups who share a common agenda and work toward the same goal: keeping the White House in Democratic hands and gaining ground in Congress and state governments.

Some of us are still working through the stages of grief, but what’s happened in just a couple of days seems little short of miraculous — in light of the preceding months of breathless coverage focused on every little sign of division.

The events of this week leave no doubt that the Democrats will form a united front in the coming campaign. This week also erased any doubt in my mind that Donald Trump will lose. He’s already blowing it big-time, and the Dems have a Murderers’ Row lined up against him.

As someone noted on MSNBC, when Bill Clinton is your number-four campaign surrogate*, then you’ve got one hell of a rotation.

*Behind President Obama, Elizabeth Warren, and Bernie Sanders, not necessarily in that order.

The other good news? Bernie has begun the process of transforming his “political revolution” from a personal crusade into a movement of lasting impact. He moved the Democrats to the left through the effectiveness of his campaign; his voters will be impossible to ignore going forward.

The accepted wisdom on “the politics of the possible” has undergone a seismic shift. For years we’ve been simply trying to limit the damage — accepting incremental reforms or slightly less harmful cuts, celebrating non-defeats as though they were victories. Now, a bunch of stuff is suddenly on the table: universal health care, a $15 minimum wage, enhanced Social Security, creating a fairer tax system, re-establishing a progressive Supreme Court, and bringing campaign finance under some semblance of control.

The liberals might just be back on offense for the first time since pre-Vietnam Lyndon Johnson. And I don’t think I’ve felt this good about politics since the fall of Richard Nixon.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Well, that didn’t take long

  1. Philip Beliveau

    That “bunch of stuff on the table” will be swept off when HC takes office. She is humoring us. That money will have to be devoted to regime change around the world!

    Reply
    1. John S. Walters Post author

      When Clinton was in the Senate, she was consistently one of its most liberal members. Yes, she voted wrong on the Iraq War, but so did just about everyone else. Sorry she’s not as pure as Bernie, but she’s far from the neocon/Wall Street stalking horse that some people accuse her of being.

      Reply
  2. Acarn

    Im no fan of Clinton, and won’t be voting for her come November, but she’s a better candidate than trump. I look forward to casting my vote for Jill Stein, and watching Clinton annihilate trump

    Reply
  3. Steve Beck

    I will vote for HRC, holding my nose and alerting the poll workers, when I give my name, that I hope the are current with their CPR skills if I faint while holding my breath. This voting for the lesser-of -two-evils has been gong on for too long, and I, personally am tired of it.

    Reply
  4. Dave Katz

    It’s the media, Jake. We really, reallly, really need a better one. Horse race analogies and a winner:good/loser:bad dualistic narrative are all they got, most of ’em, the lazy bastards. That’s what you get with media consolidation in corporate hands, praise be to Senator Sanders, John Nichols of The Nation, and Robert McChesney, on speaking tour back in 2005, predicting exactly what has, in fact, come to pass–the inevitable Idiocracy of a Donald Trump nomination. (On the night of California, Fox, CNN and MSNBC all ran footage of Trump’s empty podium, while HRC was giving her victory speech. Apparently the podium was more newsworthy than the first woman Presidential nominee.) Corporate media control=bidnessman conman candidate who’s got nuthin’ in his repertoire but the low-hanging fruit of hate and fear. Go bidnessmen conmen!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s