The ever-constipated Campaign of Ideas has pooped out another rock-hard nugget… this time, by way of emailed press release without any live contact with reporters.
And no wonder. Even Mahatma has to realize this one’s a clunker.
It’s a two-part plan to clean up Lake Champlain.
I repeat: “two-part.”
And part one is:
Catalyze the cleanup of Lake Champlain without raising new revenue.
Yes, part one is nothing more than a restatement of the overall idea.
Step two is even worse: he wants to raid an existing fund to pay for a tiny fraction of cleanup costs:
Amend the “Vermont Housing and Conservation Trust Fund Act” to allocate the part of the Vermont Housing and Conservation Board’s funds used for conservation to cleaning up Lake Champlain.
(Bold type is Milne’s.)
The appendix to part two is renaming VHCB as the “Vermont Housing and Lake Champlain Cleanup Trust.”
And that’s it. That’s his entire Lake Champlain cleanup “plan.”
Okay, a couple of small problems right off the bat.
— This would strip VHCB of its ability to do any other conservation work: conserving farmland through the purchase of development rights; helping preserve natural areas, historic properties, wildlife habitat; purchasing land for new parks and wildlife areas; and helping provide public access to conserved land.
— It would provide, by Milne’s own estimate, a measly $7.4 million per year for a cleanup that’s estimated to cost $150 million. In the absence of a comprehensive plan, that money won’t have much impact.
Milne isn’t bothered by robbing VHCB to pay for the lake; indeed, he says there’s no need for VHCB to do any conservation:
Milne said more than half of Vermont’s land is either owned by the state or federal government, or under some sort of easement that prohibits development today.
“I say half of our state being set aside is good enough for the next five years,” according to Milne. “Let’s have this board and these dollars go towards affordable housing and cleaning up the Lake.
Hmm. He thinks there’s more than enough conserved land in Vermont. And this is the same guy who wants to suburbanize a chunk of land off I-89 in Hartford. And who has said he’d like Vermont to take a more New Hampshire-style approach to conservation and development.
Which makes me suspect that Milne wouldn’t like to see any new regulations on farmland or developed areas or wastewater treatment.
Oh, I forgot another small problem with the plan: There’s no way in Hell the feds would buy it. And we’re under pressure from the EPA to do some real substantive stuff. This ain’t it.
I think I see why he slipped this one over the transom and avoided interacting with the media. Even by Milne’s standards, this idea is a real clunker.
(Note: As of this writing, Milne hadn’t posted the plan on his website. I’m sure he’ll think of it sometime.)