
At his Wednesday press conference, Gov. Phil Scott was studiously noncommittal on the use of state prisons to house federal detainees. He unironically expressed the belief that it might be better for detainees like Mohsen Mahdavi to be kept in Vermont instead of being dragged off to Mississippi (where Vermont routinely sends its own inmates) or some other hellhole. But he left the door open to working with lawmakers on that issue and others, as the Legislature considers ways to manage state cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
Behind the scenes, something very different is happening. The Scott administration appears to be stonewalling a legislative panel with jurisdiction over the prison contract.
This comes from Independent Rep. Troy Headrick, a member of the House Corrections & Institutions Committee, with additional input from fellow committee member, Democratic Rep. Conor Casey.
Headrick wrote a blogpost on April 16 detailing “executive obstruction” frustrating the committee’s work on the issue. “In committee, we have developed a tri-partisan consensus,” Headrick writes, “that Vermont has no business being complicit with [Immigration and Customs Enforcement]’s repeated violations of due process, the First Amendment, and basic human rights.”
Unfortunately, he continues, this effort to end the feds’ use of state prisons to hold detainees has been “stalled… by direct interference from the Governor’s office.”
According to Headrick, the governor’s office has “prohibited” any communication with the committee, on or off the record, by Department of Corrections personnel. Which is a fine kettle of fish, considering that “Corrections” is right there in the committee’s name. It is the House panel responsible for oversight of Corrections.
Headrick and Casey communicated directly with Scott’s chief of staff Jason Gibbs to try to break the embargo. They expressed their desire to reach agreement quietly and cooperatively with DOC, and sought a meeting with Gibbs “at your earliest convenience.”
Headrick reports that Gibbs rebuffed the request. Casey said that Gibbs’ only response was “RCVD,” short for “Received.”
Nice. Gibbs might as well have used the middle-finger emoji.
To repeat, this was not an attempt by two progressive lawmakers to undermine or override the administration. They were trying to work out an agreement without publicity. And the governor’s top aide responded with a virtual spit in the face.
This is why I’ve started putting quotes around “Governor Nice Guy.” And why my lip curls and my eyebrows peak whenever I hear the governor say “come to the table.” Experience informs us that he doesn’t mean a bit of it.

Has there been a study/list of accomplishments showing what the Governor has actually done that effects the state positively or at all while in office? My impression is he always says no and offers no leader ship. I do not understand why there is not more active opposition.
I completely agree with you.
“Governor” Gibbs has been driving this clown car since the day he became Scott’s chief of staff, in 2017. Wherever he was or whatever he was doing after having left Douglas’s staff, it apparently included a graduate course where he honed his already-considerable arts of obstruction, obfuscation and confrontation. To what end, I have no idea as it’s unlikely a red wave is going to sweep into the Statehouse any time soon. Has he spent the eight years gathering his board tokens for a run at governor whenever Scott finally decides he really does want to get back to Thunder Road?
At any rate, it just seems like Scott is the GOP banner and Gibbs is the wind that blows it whatever way he will.