So, how’s it goin’ down Phil Scott way?
For starters, he still hasn’t decided what he means by his core budgeting principle, that he would oppose any state budget that grows faster than wages or the state economy. April B. McCullum of the Burlington Free Press:
Scott has yet to settle on the formula he will use to measure the economy and limit state spending: Tax revenue? Gross state product? Median household income? Some combination?
Just a reminder, we’re almosttot the halfway mark between his election and his inauguration. And there’s some holidays between now and then.
Which also applies to naming a cabinet and staffing an entire administration, where he continues to fall further and further behind the pace set by Peter Shumlin in 2010, and which he’s apparently in no hurry to do. Neal Goswami of the Vermont Press Bureau:
Since winning the governor’s office on Nov. 8, Scott, a Republican, has appointed four people to serve on his staff. But top-level cabinet positions remain unfilled. Six years ago, outgoing Democratic Gov. Peter Shumlin named several such appointees within a couple of weeks of his election.
… “When you have hundreds, literally hundreds of applications, it takes a little time and I don’t want to leave anything on the table. I want to make sure that we fully, fully take a look at their backgrounds, what they could bring to the table … and talent is very, very important,” Scott said.
Good to know talent is important. I was hoping the next cabinet wouldn’t feature Larry, Darryl and Darryl.
And the idea of open auditions for cabinet posts is certainly small-D democratic at its core, but wouldn’t it make sense for an incoming governor to have a few ideas going in? Maybe have a small team do some pre-election planning, even?
If they’re truly starting from scratch with piles and piles of applications, well, sheesh. I’ve never been elected governor of anything (although I am the captain of my kitchen), but I’d have a pretty good notion of the people I’d want at the top levels of my hypothetical administration.
Oh, and here’s a little tidbit that somebody might have thought to mention before Election Day, courtesy April B.
Outgoing Gov. Peter Shumlin, a Democrat, claimed this week that his administration already “righted the ship,” and that during his tenure the state budget grew less than the growth in Vermont’s gross state product.
An analysis by the Legislature’s Joint Fiscal Office showed state spending exceeded gains in Vermont’s gross domestic product in fiscal years 2012-14, but in recent years state spending has grown more slowly than the economy.
Well, gee whillikers, what do you know. State spending grew in the wake of a killer recession and Tropical Storm Irene, and was then brought under control in Shumlin’s final two years.
Which means what? Phil Scott’s mantra about the reckless spending increases of the past six years was nothing more than a politically motivated piece of accounting fakery?
How about that.
If that had ever been mentioned before now, I missed it. (And I’m sure whoever reported it will promptly correct me.)
(And I’ll ask them why they never fact-checked Candidate Scott on his alleged factoid.
In any case, one of these days Phil Scott will have to stop running for governor and start actually, y’know, governing.
Maybe instead of reinventing the budgetary wheel based on some arbitrary statistic we stick with the time-tested, albeit imperfect, process of using projections? I don’t think Phil and the gang really GET what government is. They may very well think it is just a really big business.
“In any case, one of these days Phil Scott will have to stop running for governor and start actually, y’know, governing.”
Really? Who was that last Republican governor? Jimmy D? Ol’ Scissor Hands? And when was it he actually, you know, ‘governed?’
“They may very well think it is just a really big business.”
I am sure that they will be the ones that get the breaks in a Scott administration that we will pay for.