A tale of two Phils

Throughout the gubernatorial campaign, there were two very different Phil Scotts to be inferred. One was the good guy compromiser who wants to get everybody in a room and work everything out in a broadly tripartisan way.

The other? The business owner whose first venture ran afoul of Act 250, whose current company and favorite hobby are both heavily invested in fossil fuels, whose campaign kickoff took place at the annual convention of Vermont road contractors, who sometimes dog-whistled on issues like abortion, and who frequently made reference to consulting business leaders when making policy.

The first, a moderate in the classic mode. The second, a creature of the fiscally conervative business community.

The first, a candidate who attracted quite a few moderate and liberal voters. The second, a target for suspicion in many liberal circles, including this little tiny one. A suspicion fueled by his single-minded focus on reining in the budget without any tax or fee increases, at a time when (1) we might be in for significant federal cutbacks and (2) we still have an antiquated tax system with multiple revenue sources that aren’t keeping up.

So anyway, two Phils.

And so far since his election, there’s a rather scant mix of portents on view. Too Soon To Tell which Phil we’re getting, although I’m leaning slightly toward the optimistic side.

We’ll start with signs of the Good Phil.

There was that joint statement with Governor Shumlin, calling on Vermonters to “present a unified voice urging compassion, commitment to community and fierce dedication to equal rights and justice” during “this time of national discord.”

There’s the need to anoint a replacement for TJ Donovan as Chittenden County State’s Attorney. Seven Days’ Mark Davis reports that Scott will consult Donovan on his replacement; and a list of potential successors includes two Donovan deputies and a couple of Democratic or Dem-leaning attorneys. A more dogmatic fellow would see an opening to slip a Republican into a usually safe Democratic seat.

Less quantifiable but nonetheless noteworthy: a general tone of inclusiveness and a relative lack of hard-line markers. Lots of “we’ll sees”.

Signs of the Bad Phil: His transition team is larded with veterans of the Jim Douglas administration plus staffers from his campaign. He has yet to appoint any Democrats, Progressives, or independents to his team. It is still early, though.

There was his post-election claim of a “mandate,” and his assertion that the voters put the Legislature on notice.

By, um, re-electing almost all of them? And tilting the partisan balance slightly to the left?

At that same presser, Scott said he wants to create “a business-friendly environment,” which is a whole symphony of dog whistles.

In sum, there’s evidence for suspicion and for anticipation. The deciding factor for me, that makes me lean toward the very cautiously optimistic view?

Sheer practicality.

Governor Scott will have to work with a Democratic Legislature. They don’t have a veto-proof majority, but they have plenty of power to block unpalatable proposals. If Scott wants to advance his agenda, he will have to find common ground with Democrats.

This will be even more critical if, as I suspect, the election of Donald Trump will bring cuts in federal funding. I think — I hope — that Scott is perceptive enough to see that his best chance for a successful administration is to reach across the aisles, rather than pursuing a conservative agenda.

And one more thing. I doubt that Phil Scott thinks in terms of bare-knuckle politics, but if he did, he’d know that he owes the Republicans nothing. He ran far ahead of the rest of the ticket, basically winning the race entirely on his own. If anyone in the VTGOP was inclined to press an agenda, he wouldn’t have any practical reason to abandon a centrist course in favor of conservative dogma.

On the other hand, you know about me and predictions.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “A tale of two Phils

  1. Chiara Resnik

    This kind of bitter partisan rhetoric is why Middle America Dems voted Trump, why Dems have been demolished in state legislatures and in DC under Obama. Why are the policies and stances you personally like “good” and others “bad”? Why must you blanket demonize all other points of view whether moderate Dem or conservative or Republican?

    Ultra far-left partisan hacks like yourself don’t want useful dialogue or debate. All you want to do is rant and hate on anyone that does not believe in your own narrow ideology. Someone as petty and close-minded as you gets Fair Game just shows how low Seven Days has fallen, and how pathetic media in Vermont has become. Under the new Trump era, Dems don’t need haters and dividers like you. We need rational voices that can bring back lost Dem demographics, jobs to union areas, and be proud of America and all Americans. Instead we are stuck with identity politics playing losers like you. The end of our party is here.

    Reply
    1. John S. Walters Post author

      If you think I’m an “ultra far-left partisan,” then you ain’t seen no ultra far-left partisans. I’m a moderate on some issues and a progressive on others.

      And sheesh, I have written elsewhere about the need for the Democratic Party to reconnect with disaffected parts of its base, most notably the working class. Too many of their policies are aimed at college-educated leftists, and not enough is designed to counter the wealth gap and the rigged tax system that fosters wealth inequality. I could go on, but hey, you’re not listening anyway.

      Reply
    2. eddo

      Um, Mr. Walters “ultra far-left”? He supported Hillary, that’s not the act a an UFLeftie. You mention your disdain for bitter rhetoric and then dive right in yourself. Take a breath, relax, chill.

      Reply
    3. Philip Beliveau

      Wow. I found this dialogue mildly partisan and hardly bitter. Dems have certainly not been demolished in the Vt legislature. To describe this dialogue with words like bitter, demonize, close-minded, hack, loser, pathetic and petty seems quite over the top.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s