The feds pull back from private prisons; will Vermont follow?

The Justice Department wants to get out of the private prison business.

Its announcement follows last week’s release of am Inspector General’s report showing that for-profit prisons are failures by just about any metric.

… privately operated facilities incurred more safety and security incidents than those run by the federal Bureau of Prisons. The private facilities, for example, had higher rates of assaults — both by inmates on other inmates and by inmates on staff — and had eight times as many contraband cellphones confiscated each year on average, according to the report.

All that, in spite of the fact that the inmates housed at for-profit prisons were “mostly low security” types.

Cherry on the sundae: the prisons “do not save substantially on costs,” according to Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates.

This ought to be another nail in the coffin of the privatization movement, which promises more efficiency and lower costs, but in fact deliver poor service, healthy profits for contractors, and employment security for their lobbyists and lawyers.

Before we get to the implications for Vermont, here’s your Moment of Schadenfreude: share prices in the two biggest private-prison companies collapsed on Wall Street, closing down by more than one-third.

Among those crowing at the news was Bernie Sanders, who noted that this was “exactly what I campaigned on as a candidate for president.”

Okay, Bernie. Care to comment on Vermont’s continued use of for-profit prisons?

The Inspector General’s report itself should have been enough of a wake-up call. It raises serious questions about how the state oversees its private prison contracts, since responsible officials continually insist that everything’s hunky-dory.

The Justice Department’s move could potentially make it harder for states to swear off private prisons, at least in the shorter term. Those federal inmates have to go somewhere, and the feds have made deals with state and local governments to lease their “excess” space. Vermont is doing so right now, in a move that added a few bucks to our depleted coffers but also extended our dependence on for-profit prisons.

The real impact of the Justice Department directive will play out over the next several years, as current contracts expire. And it could be revised or thrown out by the next administration. But still, an ACLU official called it “historic and groundbreaking.”

Time for Vermont to make a little history of its own.


5 thoughts on “The feds pull back from private prisons; will Vermont follow?

  1. NanuqFC

    “also slowed momentum toward our dependence on for-profit prisons”

    I take it you meant away from our dependence on for-profit prisons, since the beds leased to the feds meant fewer beds for our own felons.

    Nice when the gummint eventually comes to see the truth of what advocates have been saying for a long time about for-profit prisons. The model just doesn’t work, equals fewer services, lower staff pay (not counting the CEOs), worse food, understaffing, all in order to squeeze out profits for the stockholders and upper “management.”

  2. Dave G.

    Oh stop pointing out the disconnect between Bernie and actual Vermont reality. That’s taboo, don’t you know. BTW: Bernie was missing too when Vermont state workers were fighting against austerity measures being shoved down their throats by Democratic politicians.

  3. Wallace Nolen

    These facts bring into the real question is why there isn’t a different form of punishment, restitution, etc. worldwide (not just USA/Vermont) especially for non-violent crimes! Such programs like work-release, community service, etc. for non-violent offenders.

  4. Dave Katz

    I can’t be so sure that CCA and the rest are going gently into that good night, in spite of the stock price drubbing.On Democracy Now! tonight, the Dem nom’s sister in law rolled tape of the CCA CEO–that’s almost musical, except for the inescapable fact the fellow must just plain suck as a human being–saying, in effect, “We’ve got the next four years wired, dudes. No worries.” And the full Giuliani nutzo has yet to be gone by the Asshole Party on Black Lives Matter, though the thunder clouds are darkening in the near distance; the cringing Dems haven’t exactly leapt on board the racial justice vs. law’n’order train, waiting to see how it plays out on Chris Matthews, no doubt. Good times for prisons be jes’ roun the cawnah, according to Jeff Sessions, Trump’s Chief Justice pick. And the lobby money flows and flows and flows. I’d be looking for a retrenchment and a doubling down on private for profits at the state level, all the while maintaining a discrete but persistent presence on K Street as well.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s