Paul Ralston’s vanity project

This political season, with its rare turnover in the top ranks, has generated quite a bit of activity from politicos whose aspirations are no surprise — Phil Scott, Bruce Lisman, Matt Dunne, Sue Minter, TJ Donovan, etc. — but it’s also created some real headscratchers. There are people running for high office who cause me to wonder, “Who asked for this?”

So far, this category largely centers on the race for lieutenant governor, which has attracted a pair of high-profile liberal lawmakers and a trio of candidates who seemingly came out of nowhere: Brattleboro-area investment dude Brandon Riker, recently repatriated Washington journalist Garrett Graff, and Rutland-area doctor Louis Meyers. Nothing against these worthies or their noble intentions; but really, who asked for this?

Now comes another would-be candidate from out of nowhere, giving his own distinctive twist to this narrative: former State Representative and Vermont Coffee Company founder Paul Ralston. He has declared his potential candidacy for An Office To Be Named Later, under the banner of A Party To Be Named Later Or Maybe Independent, and created his own weekly radio show as a platform for his amorphous ambition.

Nothing against Paul Ralston; he makes my favorite coffees, a hell of a lot better than that Keurig sludge. But this whole thing strikes me as a vanity project more than anything else.

Added bonus: his radio show is the latest step in the devolution of WDEV’s daily schedule. It used to feature one hour of conservative talk, one hour of liberal talk, and two hours of Mark Johnson. Of that noble endeavor, only the conservative hour remains intact. The liberal hour has fragmented into “whatever WDEV can find that’ll fill the hour and maybe generate some cash.” The Thursday hour used to be a forum for Small Dog Electronics founder Don Mayer to dispense Apple advice and promotion; now it’s Paul Ralston from a makeshift studio at Vermont Coffee Company, hosting a show called “The Reluctant Politician.”

Full disclosure, I haven’t listened to it. My comments are based solely on the concept.

For starters, that word “reluctant” makes me laugh. Truly reluctant people don’t take to the airwaves to dangle themselves before the electorate in hopes of inciting a bandwagon. Who the hell is going to call this meatball of a program, or even listen? Those who think Paul Ralston is the bee’s knees, that’s who.

Ralston served two terms in the House as a Democrat representing Middlebury. When he entered politics, the Democrats had high hopes for him as a successful businessman trumpeting the liberal cause.

Relations quickly soured, as Ralston turned out to be a thoroughly independent cuss with a well-developed sense of his own brilliance. Kind of a lower-case Peter Galbraith, if you will. His centrist-cum-DINO politics were a big part of it, but he’s far from the only DINO in the house. (Jim Condon, for example, is a strongly pro-business Democrat who does just fine in the caucus.) The bigger problem was his impatience with the process. He didn’t, as they say in kindergarten report cards, Play Well With Others. His own words provide an unintentional window on his problematic tenure:

“Seventy-five percent of my experience in politics has been good. Twenty-five of it has been really boring. The first time I ever fell asleep in a meeting was in a Democratic caucus,” he said.

Yeah, well, your caucus appreciates your attention and support. Personally, if I were a lawmaker, I’d find the caucus fairly interesting compared to those endless committee sessions, listening to the Usual Suspects reciting their predigested viewpoints. But one man’s ceiling, I guess.

After a couple terms banging his head against the wall (and his colleagues’ sensibilities), Ralston retired from active politics. But apparently the itch is still there, and he’s looking for a way back into the arena that doesn’t require all that messy, wonky insider work.

Yes, there’s a lot of taking your castor oil in politics. You’ve got to make nice with local apparatchiks, you’ve got to raise money, and if you win, you have to carry out the duties of office, the fun and the not-so-fun. Paul Ralston’s disaffection is emblematic of the problems faced by successful businesspeople entering politics. It’s a different game played by different rules. Some of that is hidebound hierarchic nonsese, but a lot of it exists for very good reasons.

In any case, it’s not going to change simply because Paul Ralston thinks it’s beneath him. And as for this self-promotional radio show? Sorry, I won’t be tuning in.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Paul Ralston’s vanity project

  1. newzjunqie

    Only in VT! Day late, dollar short, a few fruit-loops shy of a full box. Can’t wait for egomaniacal fire-breathing, walking-talking temper-tantrum waiting for a place to happen, Mr Galbraith–the, um diplomat(?) adding yet another ring to the election circus in VT by running for guvnuh.

    Reply
  2. Jane Stein

    BTW, I got a lengthy robo-poll on my landline the other day which was primarily asking me about every constitutional office whether I would vote for Scott Milne or somebody else. Scott Milne? Is he looking for an office to run for?

    Reply
    1. John S. Walters Post author

      He keeps talking about it and not doing anything about it. If he were a typical politician, his time would be running short. In 2014, Milne waited until the filing deadline to actually declare his candidacy for governor. Which was the first in a series of “missteps” that “doomed” his candidacy in the eyes of every political observer. We were all wrong, of course… although to be real, Milne’s near-victory was a matter of tiny turnout more than Milne-mentum. He got something like 20,000 fewer votes than Brian Dubie did in 2010.

      Reply
  3. Paul Kerin

    Wow! Haven’t seen such veiled hatred since B.D.S. (Bush Derangement Syndrome) and directed at one of your own! I guess that’s what happens to those who have an awakening as to the truth behind today’s Democrat party. Paul Ralston’s only mistake was to assume he could bring a moderate voice back to Vermont’s Democrat party.He was wrong and wisely decided to get out.
    A brief history lesson. It was a Democrat controlled legislature that refused African American Alan Keyes an opportunity to speak in front of it, told the niece of Martin Luther King that she could only come to the state house to speak on a Sunday (when no one was there of course), had a member of the Democrat party walk out on the Bishop of the Catholic church and took members of its own party behind closed doors to threaten them into voting the party line with respect to the civil union debate. It’s not surprising then that you would attack Paul’s radio program before it even aired.
    Just keep reminding yourself that you are from the party that represents all votes counted and all voices heard.Or are those voices just the ones who agree with you?

    Reply
  4. newzjunqie

    Looking like there’s a bunch of wanna-be gov hopefuls who see opening as on-ramp to fifth floor. Seem to be desperately seeking lite-gov as it amounts to two year well-paid life-of-riley, while internally running for top job. Personally think some actual ‘work’ needs to be added which will raise bar a bit & cut down on the riff-raff. Hopefully voters realize we’re voting for who will take over if governor is somehow disabled. We’ve had good luck up to now, hope it continues.

    Starring in own reality show & shadow campaign to ‘reluctantly’ explore a run for an unknown or yet-to-be-disclosed office which is yet to be decided–decision to be made by suggestions offered by ‘callers’ aka fan club–seriously? Complete with oh-so convenient ‘wife pushed me into it’ cover. Uh huh.

    Appears as taking page from Lisman playbook. After years of effete but clear ambition for top job, merely offering his help for VT b/c “people have been asking me to run” –not about ME mind you-all about THEM & how I can best serve VTers.’ What a load of high minded horsecrap & he has lots of company from the many misfits who one by one have been laughed out of VT politics making Fred Tuttles’ VT sage wisdom & Jack McMullen, aka “six teats” household word & one for the history books. None of of these jokers can pass the laugh test much less appear at all sincere. Parade of ‘hopefuls’ sure don’t understand VTers with trusty built-in bullshit-ometers.

    Seems to be a propensity in VT for nutty facepalm-inducing stunts–who’s next?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s