Where Did You Sleep Last Night?

Yesterday evening I did what no member of the press corps has seemingly bothered to do: I visited the the Agency of Natural Resources Annex, d/b/a Winters Hall, one of the Scott administration’s four hastily-assembled temporary shelters.

And this is what’s inside all that steel and concrete: 20 cots, each with its own flimsy plastic-wrapped blanket.

And… well, that’s about all. (There used to be more cots, but some have been removed due to lack of usage.)

Oh, there are three porta-potties just outside the entrance. Because, I was told, the indoor facilities aren’t working. The building was flooded last July, and apparently the facilities have been offline since.

Credit to the Vermont National Guard for doing their best to prepare the space. The shelter was clean and orderly, though it remains disquietingly industrial. There was no sign of flood damage or mold, at least not in the section of the building being used as shelter. The Guard were helpful and polite during my visit. They were carrying out the mission: Responding to situations to the best of their ability with the resources they are given.

But c’mon, this is a disgrace. Don’t blame the Guard; blame the Scott administration. This was their idea.

The shelter space is huge, more like an airplane hangar than a place for people to sleep. (With bigger doors, it’d be a fine hangar.) At the far end of this vast echo chamber are a couple of folding tables and a few chairs, where the Guards and a pair of medical personnel welcome people, get them situated, and tend to their needs within the extremely limited resources available. There are two boxes of miscellaneous snacks and drinks, dropped off by a local social service agency. Twinkie and bottled water for breakfast, anyone?

One small amenity: the Guard can move the cots around and put up partitions so families could sleep together with a tiny bit of privacy.

Each person seeking to use the shelter must sign a form with 13 stated conditions. Intake between 7:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. only. No storage; guests may bring “minimal belongings.” No weapons, drugs, or other illegal substances. Guests can leave the building only for designated smoking breaks; if they leave for any other reason, they will not be readmitted. (Unstated but assumed: They can go outside to use a porta-potty.) There is one designated smoking area, to which “Access and frequency are staff dependent.” Bedding must be “returned to normal daytime condition by 7:00 a.m.” Guests must leave no later than 7:00. If shelter staff decide you need medical attention, you must leave in an ambulance if told to.

“No disruptive behavior, violence or threats will be tolerated.” (Okay, fair enough.) “Quiet hours from 10:30 p.m. until 6:00 a.m. with no talking, no electronic devices or lights.” (Assuming an exception for potty runs.) “No sexual conduct or nudity.” (Again, fair enough.) No visitors. No pets allowed except service or assistance animals. If you “are asked to leave you are expected to do so respectfully… or law enforcement will be called.”

Some of that is fine, but the totality seems more like a prison than a shelter. There’s not much personal dignity on offer. Is it any surprise the place has gone virtually unused? (As of Monday morning, one single person had made use of Winters Hall.)

Would you want to sleep there if you had any other options? Even if it meant sleeping in your car (if you had a car) or on some tolerant person’s couch? Some have apparently preferred to sleep outside, although that equation may have changed since the temperatures dropped below freezing last night and we got a dusting of snow on the ground. Still too warm to trigger the Adverse Weather Conditions policy, though. Sorry about that!

(Checking the forecast… low of 20 on Wednesday night, 13 on Thursday, 23 on Friday with an inch of snow, then 18 on Saturday with three inches of snow and 14 on Sunday. Well, at least that would qualify people for motel rooms under AWC. On a day-to-day basis, with no stability at all.)

This place would be perfectly appropriate in a real emergency when large numbers of people are displaced by a disaster of some sort. It is completely inappropriate in current circumstances. We are, as housing advocates put it last week, in “a manufactured crisis,” planned and executed (poorly and in haste) despite the express intent of the Legislature, which had approved a bill on March 1 that would have kept most of the 500-odd displaced Vermonters in state-paid motel rooms. If the governor had signed the bill before March 13, none of this rush would have been necessary. Of course, if he had signed the bill sooner, he couldn’t have enforced his ridiculous order.

(About 130 of that number were not displaced thanks to the intervention of nonprofits like End Homelessness Vermont, which did its best to shepherd people through the approval process in the two days between the announcement of the unhousing on Wednesday and its implementation on Friday. Now that state offices are open for the week, more people will be approved for motel stays. Which means they should never have been displaced at all, and wouldn’t have been if the process hadn’t been so needlessly rushed.)

The National Guard were, as I said, helpful and polite. I’m sure they would have treated guests the same way, assuming adherence to the rules. I told them I wouldn’t seek any on-the-record comments; that’s not what I was after. They wouldn’t have offered much anyway; they’d been given a “Troop Card” (just a standard sized sheet of paper) in that regard with five points, and I quote:

  • Your first priority is to accomplish your mission.
  • Don’t guess or speculate outside of your knowledge. If you don’t know, it’s ok to say that.
  • You don’t have to speak to media but it is encouraged. It is how we inform the public about what we are doing to help.
  • Respect the privacy of those using the shelters, no photos on-site. Be smart with social media. Do not post hateful or discriminatory content.
  • Use your troop card to help you — inject messages as frequently as possible.

At the bottom of the page are the contact numbers for Capt. Mikel Arcovitch and Marcus Tracy, the chief and deputy Public Affairs Officers for the Vermont National Guard.

The guys were cool. They let me take pictures since no guests were there. I can’t imagine any of them would even think of posting “hateful or discriminatory content.” That seems like a thing that shouldn’t need to be specified. But Guard leadership know what they’re doing. Must have been some unfortunate experiences in the past.

My visit didn’t take long, maybe 10 minutes or so. There just wasn’t much to see. Which is kind of the point: This is the most basic, perfunctory shelter you can imagine. Again, appropriate in a real emergency — but not here and not now. Not as the result of a voluntary policy decision.

6 thoughts on “Where Did You Sleep Last Night?

  1. Joe Patrissi's avatarJoe Patrissi

    I like the governor but he is over his head with how Vermont has changed since the pandemic. His lack of leadership on the homeless, housing, crime, corrections, juvenile detention and treatment, transitional housing and health care has been ineffective to say the least..Please don’t run again. We need bold and inspirational leadership. We need a governor who can manage change today, and create the change we need tomorrow.

    Reply
  2. Morgan W. Brown's avatarMorgan W. Brown

    As others have already previously said, that is not a shelter, but a warehouse. The state has gone to sheltering those they evicted from the motels recently to an attempt to warehouse them and then only overnight. What an outrageous disgrace and outright sham.

    Reply
  3. v ialeggio's avatarv ialeggio

    Sorry, my comment was not entirely accurate regarding coverage.

    Peter Case (Vermontitude podcast/Brattleboro Reformer) spoke with Miranda Gray (Deputy Commissioner, Economic Services Division/DCF) for 15 minutes yesterday, March 19.

    Some salient points:

    1. Ms Gray clearly spoke of “347 households” that were cut loose last Friday. I make that 1000 persons, give or take.
    2. re: The cost of setting up shelters vs the cost of maintaining the motel program? “$80/night in the motels vs …” No answer, that is, addressing the cost of refitting shelters, stationing National Guard troops, medical support etc. “But,” she added ” we see this [the shelters] as a ‘bridge off.'” Possibly referring “the cliff” you mentioned a couple days ago.
    3. re: Who made the call to relocate people in the four shelters?
      “It is a very fluid situation, the BAA, etc etc.” So nobody made the call, apparently.
    4. re: The question of who was to facilitate the transport of people to the shelters, from Londonderry to Brattleboro, for example?
      “We know there’s community support in some places…” and, in any event, transportation “…is not manageable for the state…You never know what people are willing to choose to do…they have to call us and tell us.”
    5. Mr. Case: The Windham County delegation was “kind of blindsided,” both by the decision to refit the Entergy building to accommodate an unknown number of unhoused people,…and that it had no say as to where the shelters were going to be set up. Is that an accurate statement?     Ms. Gray: “I don’t know how one could say they were blindsided when it’s the Legislature that voted and passed the BAA…So it really shouldn’t have been a surprise.”

    I’m sure Miranda Gray is a competent and empathetic person. But she was apprently asked to stand in front of a train for the rest of the DCF and the Scott administration. Take one for the team, you know?

    Reply
  4. v ialeggio's avatarv ialeggio

    My earlier comment got lost:

    Keep hammering on this. With the exception of a momentary notice by 7Days nobody nowhere is saying nothing.

    Reply

Leave a comment