Tag Archives: Nicholas Storellicastro

“I guess it’s time to bulldoze it and head south.”

For those who see Franz Kafka as a creator of nonfiction, a public meeting held Tuesday evening in Barre provided plenty of evidence. The title of the event was pure nectar for bureaucracy devotees: “Substantial Damage Informational Meeting.”

City officials held the event, attended by dozens of homeowners, to clear up abundant confusion around the rebuilding process after the July flood. Because Barre was so hard hit, the response has been slow, glitchy, confusing, and full of obstacles for property owners. The meeting featured a parade of people struggling to negotiate federal, state and local regulations, insurance coverage, property tax abatements, and the possibility that a flood-prone section of the city might be completely redeveloped in a few years’ time even if the houses therein are repaired. The situation puts the city’s finances in a perilous, uncertain condition — as reflected in City Council’s recent decision to postpone municipal elections from early March to early May.

The woman pictured above who, like most of the commenters, didn’t give her name, said that it would be impossibly costly to elevate her house as required for flood-proofing.. She closed with the quote that became this post’s headline, stood up, and walked away.

She was far from the only person who was at sea over how to rebuild or whether to even try. “The cost today to repair stuff is astronomical,” said a man named Gordon. “You’d be puttin’ into them houses two times what it could even sell for. And who’d want to buy ‘em now after this last flood?”

City Manager Nicholas Storellicastro said that 40 properties had already applied for buyouts, meaning the owners have no intention of rebuilding. “To be candid,” Storellicastro said, “the city can’t afford to buy out 40 homes both from a financial standpoint because we have to front all the money and then get it reimbursed, but also from a tax base standpoint, that would just be debilitating to the city.”

From the tenor of this meeting, I’d say it’s almost certain that more people will seek buyouts or simply walk away.

Continue reading

Well, This Is Just What the City of Barre Didn’t Need

Thanks to heavy damages suffered in July’s flooding, the city of Barre’s finances are completely up in the air. How much so? City Council has agreed to postpone Town Meeting Day elections until May because, per the Times Argus, “they didn’t have enough good information to comfortably adopt a budget to present to voters on the first Tuesday in March.”

Ouch. Fair to say that the last thing the city needs right now is another piece of big, bad, expensive news.

And here it is! The Barre City Wastewater Treatment Facility and its management have been found to be grossly inadequate. An agreement with the state lists 18 violations in 2020 and 2021 that depict the plant as pretty much a complete disaster. It’s officially called an “Assurance of Discontinuance,” meaning the city promises to cut it the hell out. The full agreement, signed last week by Superior Court Judge Thomas Walsh, can be downloaded here.

You might be thinking that many of Vermont’s municipal wastewater systems are trash, so what makes Barre stand out in that crowd? Well, let me tell you.

Continue reading